1 Maudal

12 Years A Slave Movie Review Essay Examples

Based on a true story, 12 Years a Slave depicts the journey of a free black man in the 1840s that is kidnapped and sold into southern slavery. Aside from the captivating story and tremendous acting, the historical accuracy of slavery during this time is gut retching. The director, Steve McQueen, does a remarkable job executing the transition of Solomon Northup’s autobiography into a live action film, but what makes this movie so captivating? What about the film makes the audience establish a new perspective on America’s dark past? The following analysis will provide some insight to the film and the story and explore why this movie will not only leave you in tears, but cause you to have a new found respect for people that endured a life of slavery.

Before I jump into the meat of the discussion and share my thoughts it is important to begin with a clear understanding of the film’s story. In the opening scene we are introduced to Solomon Northup as a slave. The film continues with a series of flashbacks between his present slave life and his previous life as a free man. For the sake of clarity I will summarize the film in historical order. Solomon Northup, played by Chiwetel Ejiofor, grew up as a freeman in upstate New York. His skills consisted of reading and writing, and he was also a very talented violinist. Solomon was a well-respected man among his community and was just like another other family man. Wife to Anne Hampton and father of two, Margaret and Alonzo; Solomon had the life most slaves would never experience.

One day Solomon runs into two men who offer him a job opportunity to which he accepts. He tells his family goodbye and believes he is on the road to his new job. Instead they drug Solomon, and sell him to the slave trade. Confused and shocked, Solomon is thrust into the horrors and cruelty of the slave trade. Claiming he was a freeman was not enough to spare his freedom. From the moment he was captured to the scene where he was sold, the film captures the cruel reality of the slave trade and the treatment of people of color. Aside from his journey the film does a great service to exposing the harsh selling methods showing how families were separated; they were put on display, nude, for a potential buyer to see. The whole process is quite disgusting.

Solomon is purchased by Master Ford of a sugar cane planation. Solomon was highly advised against relieving his knowledge and literacy to the white men, but went against this when he revealed himself to his master. Ford was kind hearted and became fond of Solomon, making Ford’s other white overseers angry. They set out to kill Solomon after a few heated encounters, which lead to a good 2-3 minute scene of Solomon dangling from a noose with his toes scraping touching the ground. Close to death, other slaves go about their day in the background as he struggles to breathe. Master Ford saves Solomon just in time but has to sell him off because he has caused him too much trouble and had to settle his debt.

Solomon is sold to Master Epps of a cotton plantation. Here is where Solomon endures the most cruelty and sees how devastating life as a slave truly is. He meets Patsey, a young black woman who is admired by Master Epps. His infatuation with her becomes dangerous when Epps’ wife becomes suspicious. Patsey, not wanting anything to do with Epps, plays along to keep her life. Her rape and whip scene are honestly one of the hardest thing to watch.

After years of hell on the plantation, a Canadian contractor is hired to work on the planation. Solomon finds trust in the man and seeks help through him. Not long after the contactor leaves, help finds its way to Solomon in the form of an old friend, Mr. Parker, who proves he is a freedman and rescues Solomon from slavery and returns him home to his family after 12 years.

Now with a general idea of the plot we can dive deeper into the material. The reason why this film will strike you different from most is because it is all true. It is a harsh reality that most people in society do not like to face. Most Americans have a preconceived idea about slavery because of intermediate and high school history classes. Yes, we have all heard the lecture that slavery was disgusting and a dark time in America’s history, but no matter how in depth your instructor was no one could prepare you for physically seeing those disgusting events.

The film not only captured the struggle that was this man’s life, but also demonstrated what other slaves suffered through as well. Seeing the treatment of these human beings really rallies you up, makes you really hate the society of that time. Seeing people being treated as dogs, no, worse than dogs, objects, boils my blood. Actually seeing everything take place makes it that much more real. People did not realize that pain and suffering slavery caused in our nation, at least not until this film. The acting portrayed by Chiwetel Ejiofor and Lupita Nyong as Patsey, was outstanding. I truly believed their emotion and character. Ejiofor’s best scene is when he is finally reunited with his family.

You can see the buildup of overwhelming relief and happiness in his eyes and face. It was pure emotion. That emotion is what really helps captivate the audience. It gets the viewers to feel along with the characters, establishing a bond between the audience and the character. When you create such a deep bond with your viewers, you create compassion and self-awareness. This provokes those preconceived notions of the ideas of slavery and causes viwers to be more respectful to those who have suffered and for people who are still being oppressed today.

12 Years a Slave (2013)

Published by The Massie Twins

Score: 6/10

Genre: Drama Running Time: 2 hrs. 14 min.

Release Date: November 1st, 2013 MPAA Rating: R

Director: Steve McQueen Actors: Chiwetel Ejiofor, Paul Giamatti, Benedict Cumberbatch, Paul Dano, Michael Fassbender, Sarah Paulson, Lupita Nyong’o, Brad Pitt


n “12 Years a Slave,” the audience witnesses the atrocities of the 1840’s American South through the eyes of the African American Solomon Northup.  The events are undeniably heart-rending, yet the protagonist views the tragedies, as does director Steve McQueen, from an emotional distance.  Rarely does Northup interfere with the lives of the other slaves.  His goal is survival, plain and simple, and while several opportunities arise for extreme moral dilemmas and dispiriting melodrama, the film shies away from the confrontation.  Overt manipulation often cheapens the effect, but in this film so little influence is utilized that moments aching to be profoundly moving lack the potency required to elicit such a response.  The subject matter lends itself to compelling stories, but the characters that suffer the worst injustices aren’t the primary focus and receive no closure.

A free black man living in Saratoga, New York, Solomon Northup (Chiwetel Ejiofor) enjoys a comfortable upper class lifestyle with his wife and children.  When two men claiming to be traveling entertainers convince Solomon to accompany them to Washington on a lucrative business venture, he agrees, only to quickly find himself the victim of a deplorable scam.  Kidnapped and sold into slavery, Solomon is transported to a sugar cane plantation in the South where he is subjected to heavy labor and brutal working conditions.  While he manages to use his skills in engineering and music to gain favor with Master Ford (Benedict Cumberbatch), Solomon is soon transferred to the cotton fields of the notoriously cruel Edwin Epps (Michael Fassbender).  Witnessing a new level of barbarity and torture to the slaves under Epps’ control, especially the frail Patsey (Lupita Nyong’o), Solomon determines never to allow despair to overcome him as he patiently waits for his chance at freedom.

“12 Years a Slave” seems to purposely aim for historical retellings of largely popularized antebellum Southern atrociousness. It tackles its text with so much detail and unwavering focus that it forgets to entertain. Perhaps McQueen isn’t concerned with anything outside of merely educating (or reeducating, or reiterating). But in approaching the adaptation by John Ridley in such a manner, the audience is subjected to more than two hours of egregious callousness, predominantly absent of the small wins that orchestrate a dynamic moviegoing experience involving stark tragedies. While following his source material, he fails to illustrate concepts not seen before (1977’s “Roots” most memorably served as the apotheosis for extreme slavery woe) – resulting in an echoing of factual, dejected victims and their hellish bondage.

Pitiable is not a strong enough word for the indescribable levels of inhumanity. Yet despite the identifiable time period and barbarism motifs, McQueen still manages to infuse his signature, frank acknowledgement of sex. It’s also problematic that recognizable character actors, including Paul Giamatti, Paul Dano, and Brad Pitt, pop up throughout the scenes. Their performances are adequate but their faces remind audiences that it’s just a movie, taking away any hope that people will be uninterruptedly immersed in the harrowing accounts.

McQueen does, however, make excellent use of his studious camera and its exhaustive meditations, dwelling on faces as if to unearth their innermost thoughts, and music, which provokes anticipation and foreshadows continued despair, few hopes, and great adversity. On the other hand, an increasingly standardized jumbling of the timeline insinuates that projects seeking awards can’t be told linearly. What he doesn’t reveal is his own perspective, instead standing on the sidelines to let the audience soak up the calamity and interpret the agonizing endurance – without the guilty pleasures of revenge, redemption, or justice.

– The Massie Twins


Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *