1 Doubar

Income Taxation Case Study

Who do taxes hurt and who do they help?

Come tax time, everyone's feeling the pinch, but let's take a look at three case studies to see how IRS rules can actually affect tax payers.

Victim #1: Frank Frugale, The Lower Income Earner

Frank started in the working world earning $36,000 per year at a non-profit. He makes $1,500/month before taxes, but his employer needs to withhold money for Medicare and Social security—about 7.65%, plus about $135 for federal income taxes—leaving Frank to live on about $1,250.25 each month.

We hope he has roommates.

Frank is comparatively lucky: he lives in a state that doesn't charge income tax. If he did, he'd have even more carved out of his tiny paycheck.

By age 40, let's say that Frank is still single (online dating has been unkind to him), but he's poured his love-sick heart into work, so now he's earning $54,000 dollars/year. After taxes, he gets two paychecks of $1,766.16 each month.

He may not be lucky in love, but he is smart in money: Frank has opened up an IRA and contributes about $4,000 a year. He's saving cash for his retirement, and since the IRA contributions are tax deductible, he's only being taxed for $50,000 rather than $54,000, so he's saving about $42 in taxes every payday. That's about $1,000 less he's paying each year. Aw yeah, stickin' it to the man.

By 65, Frank is living in a little apartment and is still single except for his goldfish named Frankenstein. Since he's worked all his life, he collects social security, thanks to all those payments he's made. He can also take out up to $25,000 per year on his IRA without being taxed on that income. A lifetime of not earning a ton has made him enjoy the little things and his goldfish has a small appetite, so he can stretch his pennies.

Victim #2: Marketing Mike

Mike is 25 and he's still in school, getting a professional degree after staying undeclared and hitting up one too many parties in his first go through college. He doesn't mind, though, because he has his sights set on a good job at a PR firm.

He's working part time at a web design company. He only makes $5,000 per year, but that doesn't mean he doesn't pay taxes. Since he freelances for the company, nothing is held out of his paycheck and he still has to file taxes.

By 40, Mike is making $100,000 a year after working his way up the ladder at the PR firm and catering to celebrities with big egos. At his last college party, Mike met Donna. They're now married with two kids, and Donna is adding $50,000 to the household from her job.

Mike and Donna file taxes jointly, and for each child, they get to deduct $3,500. They also get deductions on their house and IRA contributions. Together, they lower the amount of income they can get taxed on by about $25,000, saving about $8,000 on taxes.

The house is proving a bit of a liability, though. Mike fell from the roof trying to fix a leak, and he lives in a state that charges property taxes. The house is worth $360,000, and the property tax in the state is 0.82%, which means Mike and Donna have to find about $3,000 to pay for those taxes.

To even buy the house, Mike had to sell the stocks he had bought during his 20s with his first paycheck. The stock in Acme Company doubled in value from $1,000 to $2,000, but when Mike sells, he has to pay taxes on the gains. Capital gains taxes are 15% when Mike sold those stocks, so he'll have to pay $150 from his $2,000 ($1,000 x 0.15).

By 65, Mike still has all his hair. Equally lucky, he's still married to Donna, and they've been saving for retirement from the start, so they have $50,000 together from their IRAs and social security now that they're getting grey and want to stop work. They don't pay taxes on social security, but any withdrawals over $25,000 on those IRAs are taxed, just as they would be if Donna and Mike were working. Donna and Mike are paying about $4,000 on those IRA withdrawals, which is pricey.

Victim #3: Richard, the Entrepreneur

Richard knew he was going to go into business ever since third grade, when he charged $5 for kids who wanted to come to his birthday parties. He wasn't the most popular kid, but he could always afford candy (and birthday cakes shaped like Monopoly money). By 25, Richard had fast-tracked through business school and was hired to work in Silicon Valley for $175,000/year.

Richard could have spent money on a condo, fancy clothes, and a Bugatti. But he kind of loved his rusty Honda and always wore sneakers and jeans to fit in with the tech crowd. A lot of his money went into a savings account. Since he's earning a lot, though, he's taking a big hit from the IRS. He's paying about $9,000 for FICA taxes (Social Security taxes) and about $25,700 in income taxes. It might not be lonely at the top, but it's expensive.

By 30, Richard decides to show those guys in Silicon Valley a thing or two and starts his own business. He makes extra-important gadgets for tech guys (we have no idea what the gadgets do because it was all explained by an engineer).

By 40, the business is making $1 million in profits a year and Richard wants to take some of that money out of the company because he just got engaged. He's got a big Star Wars-themed wedding to plan (because he's very comfortable with tech stereotypes) and a house to buy.

Richard's business is a corporation (his lawyer recommended that, and so did his accountant) and that means he has to pay corporate tax. Profits of $1 million a year make the IRS very happy because it puts the company into the highest federal corporate tax bracket (35%). On top of that, Richard's company has to pay state corporate taxes. Together, those eat up $400,000.

To pay for his house and wedding, Richard decides to take out the $600,000 that's left after paying his taxes. Since his company is a corporation and he's the only owner, he can pay the money to himself as a dividend. If his company was public and he had lots of investors, he'd have to spread the wealth around.

The $600,000 dividend is taxed like regular income, and on income that high, Richard is paying $180,000 in federal income taxes plus state income taxes. Richard is rich, but…ouch.

By 65, Richard has decided he has had enough of the cutthroat world of business. He becomes a university professor, teaching students how to launch their own hugely successful gadget companies. The university pays him $125,000 per year and he works much shorter hours than he ever did, so it's a good deal. He now has time to stop and smell the roses (literally—he put in rose bushes in his garden last year).

Last year, Richard decided to sell his business. After all taxes were paid, Richard got $10 million for the company he spent years building. Not bad. After that time in his 40s when the government dinged him, Richard wanted to be smarter about taxes. He invested the $10 million in municipal bonds, which are sold by his state.

Here's the exciting part: Interest on municipal bonds in his state is free of taxes both from the federal and state government. The bonds pay 5% interest and are very stable, which means that Richard gets $500,000 each year without paying a cent in taxes. Take that, IRS. Sure, he has to pay taxes on the $125,000 he gets from the university, but that's peanuts to the money he's hauling in.

Bottom line: everyone pays the piper (er, IRS) in one way or another.

As part of our mission to provide business intelligence on the legal, tax, and operational issues of doing business in China, China Briefing presents a series of case studies based on the practical experience of professionals at Dezan Shira & Associates.


A multinational manufacturing company who had a subsidiary in China sent a group of professionals from foreign countries to direct and oversee the implementation of projects being handled in China. The company’s Chinese subsidiary had thus been making payments (service fees) to the client company for a number of years, which was later noticed and challenged by the Chinese tax bureau. Though all business relevant taxes (i.e., value-added tax, business tax, and other surcharge fees) had been withheld from such payments to cover the corporate income tax (CIT) burden for the overseas group company, no consideration had been given to the individual income tax (IIT) liabilities relating to these employees. Given the fact that these staff members were highly paid professionals, the IIT demand turned out to be a huge extra tax burden for the client company.

RELATED: Tax and Compliance Services from Dezan Shira & Associates

As requested by the client, the Dezan Shira Corporate Accounting Services team took a look at the legal position and tax status of the client and the basis for the tax bureau’s claim. In the course of our Corporate Accounting Services team’s investigation, we discovered that even though the foreign experts were sent to China to work on projects mainly involving the Chinese subsidiary, their employment relationship stayed with the overseas headquarter. Moreover, these employees were in China on business visas (M-visas) rather than work visas (Z-visas), and no taxes had ever been paid on the salaries of these individuals in China.

In order to provide the client with a complete understanding of the Chinese tax bureau’s sudden demand, as well as the tax arrangement relevant to this kind of income derived from China, we drafted and sent a memo to the client explaining the concept and the tax bureau’s methodology when considering such cases. Simultaneously, we calculated the outstanding tax payable and the potential fines and penalties on this amount.


In this case, the client approached our team after being challenged by the tax bureau – too late to avoid the additional taxes which were already incurred over the past few years. The tax bureau had a strong case to demand the deferred IIT payment under this circumstance. But Dezan Shira managed to clearly explain the situation and calculate the taxable amount, as well as offer advice on how to avoid the re-occurrence of such problems in the future.


Asia Briefing Ltd. is a subsidiary of Dezan Shira & Associates. Dezan Shira is a specialist foreign direct investment practice, providing corporate establishment, business advisory, tax advisory and compliance, accounting, payroll, due diligence and financial review services to multinationals investing in China, Hong Kong, India, Vietnam, Singapore and the rest of ASEAN. For further information, please email china@dezshira.com or visit www.dezshira.com.

Stay up to date with the latest business and investment trends in Asia by subscribing to our complimentary update service featuring news, commentary and regulatory insight.


Tax, Accounting, and Audit in China 2016
This edition of Tax, Accounting, and Audit in China, updated for 2016, offers a comprehensive overview of the major taxes that foreign investors are likely to encounter when establishing or operating a business in China, as well as other tax-relevant obligations. This concise, detailed, yet pragmatic guide is ideal for CFOs, compliance officers and heads of accounting who must navigate the complex tax and accounting landscape in China in order to effectively manage and strategically plan their China-based operations.

Human Resources and Payroll in China 2015
This edition of Human Resources and Payroll in China, updated for 2015, provides a firm understanding of China’s laws and regulations related to human resources and payroll management – essential information for foreign investors looking to establish or already running a foreign-invested entity in China, local managers, and HR professionals needing to explain complex points of China’s labor policies.


Annual Audit and Compliance in China 2016
In this issue of China Briefing, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the various annual compliance procedures that foreign invested enterprises in China will have to follow, including wholly-foreign owned enterprises, joint ventures, foreign-invested commercial enterprises, and representative offices. We include a step-by-step guide to these procedures, list out the annual compliance timeline, detail the latest changes to China’s standards, and finally explain why China’s audit should be started as early as possible.

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *